comment on

camel code just reached 500 reputation points.

Without denying the merits of Erudil's masterpiece, which is indeed worth of everybody's attention, I must point out that a great share of such reputtion points are due to camel code being exposed in best nodes for years.

Without such continuous advertising, no post, no matter how good, can reach such heights.

Two years ago, some of those nodes had less than 200 reputation points. In that situation, managing to reach best nodes notoriety was not easy, but not impossible either.

The last post to end up in that page was written in July 2002. Does it mean that no post worth of best nodes was produced ever since? I don't think so.

Perhaps we should add a "best nodes of the year" section, so that the really good nodes have a chance of getting some of the attention they deserve.

In reply to Re: Congrats to Erudil ... but maybe best nodes should be reviewed by Anonymous Monk
in thread Congrats to Erudil by boo_radley

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks