Re^3: aXML vs TT2

No need to apologize (or not!) for creating something awesome .. but, as an engineer, whenever I see something new whose purpose isn't immediately obvious, I wonder why it's there. And sometimes the answer is, "Because I had an itch!"

Alex / talexb / Toronto

"Groklaw is the open-source mentality applied to legal research" ~ Linus Torvalds

Comment on Re^3: aXML vs TT2

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: aXML vs TT2 by Logicus (Initiate) on Oct 22, 2011 at 03:44 UTC
No there was no itch, I stumbled upon aXML whilst wandering in the wilderness of programming ignorance after leaving college because I was bored. It looked like a shiny pebble so I picked it up and polished it and polished it, until it shone. Now 5 years or so later, after investing a lot of time and effort, I think of it as a diamond and I would not exchange it for anything. No classically trained computer scientist would ever conceive of doing things they way they are done in aXML, it's heretical to it's core... but it works, and it has some marvelous properties!	[reply]
Re^5: aXML vs TT2 by Anonymous Monk on Oct 22, 2011 at 03:55 UTC
No classically trained computer scientist would ever conceive of doing things they way they are done in aXML, it's heretical to it's core... but it works, and it has some marvelous properties! LOL LOL LOL	[reply]
Re^6: aXML vs TT2 by Logicus (Initiate) on Oct 22, 2011 at 04:19 UTC
You can LOL all you want you ignorant cowardly anonymous fool, it won't change the facts or the reality. Your nothing but a bully and your attitude and willingness to mock something you don't understand is utterly pathetic in my eyes. Grow up.	[reply]
Re^7: aXML vs TT2 by Anonymous Monk on Oct 22, 2011 at 06:04 UTC
Re^8: aXML vs TT2 by Logicus (Initiate) on Oct 22, 2011 at 07:37 UTC


Syntactic Confectionery Delight
	PerlMonks