Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re: object-relational Perl programming: best practice or compromise?

by Anonymous Monk
on Oct 26, 2004 at 10:52 UTC ( [id://402529]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to object-relational Perl programming: best practice or compromise?

http://poop.sourceforge.net/
  • Comment on Re: object-relational Perl programming: best practice or compromise?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: object-relational Perl programming: best practice or compromise?
by stvn (Monsignor) on Oct 27, 2004 at 01:49 UTC

    This link it often cited in converstations about this topic, but I think maybe it needs to be updated to really stay useful. I think the page footer says it all.

    Generated from Id: poop-comparison.pod,v 1.35 2003/09/30 15:47:47 autarch Exp.
    I have found the latest updated POD in the sourceforge CVS repository (only 8 hours old), however, it seems these revisions have not made it onto the main page.

    There also does seem to be some spotted activity on the poop-group list. I haven't waded through it myself, but you might find some interesting stuff there.

    -stvn

      The updates aren't on the main page because I was waiting for some clarification from Tony Bowden on Class::DBI, and waiting for a new version of Terrance's patch.

      Updates would happen more often if people sent patches more often ;)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://402529]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (2)
As of 2024-04-26 04:15 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found