Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: object-relational Perl programming: best practice or compromise?

by stvn (Monsignor)
on Oct 27, 2004 at 01:49 UTC ( [id://402874]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: object-relational Perl programming: best practice or compromise?
in thread object-relational Perl programming: best practice or compromise?

This link it often cited in converstations about this topic, but I think maybe it needs to be updated to really stay useful. I think the page footer says it all.

Generated from Id: poop-comparison.pod,v 1.35 2003/09/30 15:47:47 autarch Exp.
I have found the latest updated POD in the sourceforge CVS repository (only 8 hours old), however, it seems these revisions have not made it onto the main page.

There also does seem to be some spotted activity on the poop-group list. I haven't waded through it myself, but you might find some interesting stuff there.

-stvn
  • Comment on Re^2: object-relational Perl programming: best practice or compromise?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: object-relational Perl programming: best practice or compromise?
by autarch (Hermit) on Oct 27, 2004 at 16:22 UTC

    The updates aren't on the main page because I was waiting for some clarification from Tony Bowden on Class::DBI, and waiting for a new version of Terrance's patch.

    Updates would happen more often if people sent patches more often ;)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://402874]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-20 00:05 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found