Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl Monk, Perl Meditation
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section?

by Anonymous Monk
on Jun 07, 2015 at 08:23 UTC ( [id://1129323]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section?
in thread [OT] How about an Off Topic Section?

not an OT section, but a JavaScript section might be a good strategical move.

Not without with some kind of recruitment drive ... stackoverflow has lots of "tags" ... that are virtual deserts of interest ... a js section on perlmonks? that will get attention ?

  • Comment on Re^2: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section?
by LanX (Saint) on Jun 07, 2015 at 10:42 UTC
    We were talking about an OT sections for PM.

    Would that need a recruitment drive?

    This would grow slowly and a marathon doesn't start with a sprint.

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
    Je suis Charlie!

      You folks are spending a lot of time/energy going 'round and 'round about what exactly this new section would be named, but you don't seem to have grokked the faqlet "I think there should be a new Section..."
      Please go do that first.

      I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.

        I've "grokked it"; I just completely disagree with it. And so do a lot of other people here.

        I understand that this place is "not a democracy" (though why its not is another leading question), but surely the weight of numbers of the current, regular participants should count for something?

        And a final thought for you:

        Perhaps, if this place was (slightly) less proscribed and introverted; more open to Monk's wider, and evolving programming roles, interests and requirements; more of the once very active, now sorely missed, old guard might still be around; and the participation rate here wouldn't be falling year on year.


        With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
        Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
        "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this
        In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked
        Mh... I take it from your replies that sections are not topical. Granted.

        But I'm surprised by your harsh reaction.

        All I meant was that opening the Perl community and perlmonks to integrate JS might be a good strategic move.

        And I doubt this was discussed before, please point me to that discussion otherwise. The link you provided doesn't help here.

        And even if it was discussed before, it's not necessarily up to date cause the landscape for dynamic languages changed considerably in the last years.

        Cheers Rolf
        (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
        Je suis Charlie!

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1129323]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others learning in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-26 04:27 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found