Re: map {} list or do {} for list?

TIMTOWTDI, both are fine.

IIRC old versions of Perl had limitations with map in void context, but that's history.

Some might argue that this is more readable

for my $key ( keys %hosts ) {
    if ( $hosts{$key} != $table_count ) {
        delete $hosts{$key};
    }
}
[download]

Cheers Rolf

( addicted to the Perl Programming Language)

update

inverted unless to if

update

this works

while ( my ($key,$value) = each %hosts) {
    delete $hosts{$key}
      if $value != $table_count;
}
[download]

but I'm not sure about side effects!

edit

aha -> each

If you add or delete elements of a hash while you’re iterating over it, you may get entries skipped or duplicated, so don’t. Exception: It is always safe to delete the item most recently returned by "each()", which means that the following code will work:

while (($key, $value) = each %hash) {
    print $key, "\n";
    delete $hash{$key};   # This is safe
}
[download]

Comment on Re: map {} list or do {} for list? Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: map {} list or do {} for list? by McA (Priest) on Apr 11, 2014 at 14:58 UTC
Have you seen this post concerning `each`? http://blogs.perl.org/users/rurban/2014/04/do-not-use-each.html McA	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: map {} list or do {} for list? by LanX (Saint) on Apr 11, 2014 at 15:14 UTC
No I didn't¹ .. But problem ... a) seems to be introduced by the new randomization, so it's a bug and b) is not new, you can't nest `each %hash` cause it has global side-effects². In my case it's only local to the loop. But yeah, I would love to have something like `hashgrep` and `hashmap` in core ... Cheers Rolf ( addicted to the Perl Programming Language) ¹) maybe I should switch spending time from PM to blogs.perl.org to follow Reini, Aristoteles and Damian... ²) maybe better phrased as "bound to the the hash ref". I can imagine situations where passing around the hashref and iterating over it in different places is useful.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: map {} list or do {} for list? by choroba (Cardinal) on Apr 11, 2014 at 15:17 UTC
maybe I should switch spending time from PM to blogs.perl.org I do both. I switched from sleeping. لսႽ† ᥲᥒ⚪⟊Ⴙᘓᖇ Ꮅᘓᖇ⎱ Ⴙᥲ𝇋ƙᘓᖇ	[reply]
Re^5: map {} list or do {} for list? by LanX (Saint) on Apr 11, 2014 at 15:20 UTC
Re^2: map {} list or do {} for list? by McA (Priest) on Apr 11, 2014 at 14:35 UTC
Hi Rolf, just wanted to post this snippet: `for my $host (keys %hosts) { next if $hosts{$host} == $table_count; delete $hosts{$host}; }` [download] but checked the incomming answers before posting redundant things. In this case I had to smile because I do agree with your "taste" (++). UPDATE: Had an logic error in there: changed < to ==. McA	[reply] [d/l]


Just another Perl shrine
	PerlMonks