Re^2: map {} list or do {} for list?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: map {} list or do {} for list? by LanX (Saint) on Apr 11, 2014 at 15:14 UTC
No I didn't¹ .. But problem ... a) seems to be introduced by the new randomization, so it's a bug and b) is not new, you can't nest `each %hash` cause it has global side-effects². In my case it's only local to the loop. But yeah, I would love to have something like `hashgrep` and `hashmap` in core ... Cheers Rolf ( addicted to the Perl Programming Language) ¹) maybe I should switch spending time from PM to blogs.perl.org to follow Reini, Aristoteles and Damian... ²) maybe better phrased as "bound to the the hash ref". I can imagine situations where passing around the hashref and iterating over it in different places is useful.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: map {} list or do {} for list? by choroba (Cardinal) on Apr 11, 2014 at 15:17 UTC
maybe I should switch spending time from PM to blogs.perl.org I do both. I switched from sleeping. لսႽ† ᥲᥒ⚪⟊Ⴙᘓᖇ Ꮅᘓᖇ⎱ Ⴙᥲ𝇋ƙᘓᖇ	[reply]
Re^5: map {} list or do {} for list? by LanX (Saint) on Apr 11, 2014 at 15:20 UTC
not all of us have a hate relation with their family ;-b Cheers Rolf ( addicted to the Perl Programming Language) PS: hope to see you soon again, mate! :)	[reply]