go ahead... be a heretic | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Two years ago I wrote a short Perl test for perspective employees of the company I work for...
The test is part of a larger exam that also covers 'C', Unix, Java and SQL. Candidates are asked to rate their knowledge of the technoglogies from none, fair, good or expert. Therefore, I want the Perl section just to give me an indication that they are telling the truth. If we wanted a Perl specialist I'd do a technical interview with them later. The problem is I don't think the test I wrote does this. While some questions seem reasonable to me, I get complaints about others. OK Question 1 is a bit of a trick question - I think I originally saw it suggested on a Perl site and thought it fair enough. But I've seen fairly decent Perl people getting 3,4,5,6 and 7 wrong. Does any one have any better suggestions? Needless to say that I consider most people who read this site as more than acceptable for our needs! edited: Fri May 2 16:19:40 2003 by jeffa - title change (was: A Perl test) In reply to A Perl aptitude test by Jonathan
|
|