![]() |
|
Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer |
|
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
My complaint is primarily about aliases, where I don't understand why Perl complains about when overwriting an alias to 1 but not one to [ 1,2,3,$x] (see examples in my OP especially the update)
Both are literal constructs unbound to any named variable. I'm NOT saying that anonymous arrays -ie the content - should be immutable, but their reference.
Cheers Rolf In reply to Re^6: Shouldn't references be readonly?
by LanX
|
|