Re^2: Extending a Parse::RecDescent grammar for inline comments


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks

Re^2: Extending a Parse::RecDescent grammar for inline comments

by bronto (Priest)

on Aug 20, 2010 at 14:47 UTC ( [id://856286]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re: Extending a Parse::RecDescent grammar for inline comments
in thread Extending a Parse::RecDescent grammar for inline comments

Thanks for the suggestion! Is it possible to do it in a way that I can capture the content of the comment?

Ciao!
--bronto

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.

Comment on Re^2: Extending a Parse::RecDescent grammar for inline comments

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Extending a Parse::RecDescent grammar for inline comments by ikegami (Patriarch) on Aug 20, 2010 at 14:58 UTC
Then it's not a comment at all (i.e. it's meaningful), and you'd match it like anything else (i.e. not use `<skip>`).	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Extending a Parse::RecDescent grammar for inline comments by bronto (Priest) on Aug 23, 2010 at 10:53 UTC
That's what I tried to do, actually, e.g. adding an InlineComment rule, but I failed. Do you know the correct way to do this? Thanks! Ciao! `--bronto` In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.	[reply]
Re^5: Extending a Parse::RecDescent grammar for inline comments by ikegami (Patriarch) on Aug 23, 2010 at 17:34 UTC
You didn't post that code, so I can't help you find what's wrong with it.	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom

Log In^?

Domain Nodelet^?

www.com | www.net | www.org

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://856286]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others sharing their wisdom with the Monastery: (2)

As of 2024-04-26 07:45 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Today I Learned

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found