Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: one-line split file sequence checker

by kyle (Abbot)
on Jan 22, 2008 at 21:55 UTC ( [id://663702]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: one-line split file sequence checker
in thread one-line split file sequence checker

You can make map(/.([0-9]+)$/, into map(/.(\d+)$/, too.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: one-line split file sequence checker
by wdef2 (Acolyte) on Jan 22, 2008 at 22:31 UTC
    perl -e 'for $c (sort {$a<=>$b} map(/.(\d+)$/, <*[0-9]>)){ ++$n == $c || print map("$_\n", $n...$c-1) ; $n=$c }'

    Ah, that's getting closer to the line noise effect I was looking for, thanks ;=) Time to read up on that map command and why <> is globbing filenames in the current dir. I'm almost pleased to see there's no offered improvement to the basic idea. There's no way to get rid of that 'for' iterator, or the 'print'? -lane ? Any shorthand for sort {$a<=>$b}? Just wondering.

      If you're just golfing, you can throw away a few characters:

      perl -e 'for$c(sort{$a<=>$b}map/(\d+)$/,<*[0-9]>){++$n==$c||print map" +$_\n",$n..$c-1;$n=$c}'

      If you want to get rid of the sort, try an array:

      perl -le '@f=map/(\d+)$/,<*[0-9]>;@x[@f]=@f;for(1..$#x){$x[$_]||print} +'

      Note that if you have a file named '0', it will basically ignore it, but that was the original behavior too. This may eat more memory, but I doubt that will be an issue until you're working with millions of files.

        You can golf that a bit more:
        perl -le '@x[@f]=@f=map/(\d+)$/,<*[0-9]>;$x[$_]||print for+1..$#x'

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://663702]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others learning in the Monastery: (2)
As of 2024-04-26 05:07 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found