![]() |
|
go ahead... be a heretic | |
PerlMonks |
Re^6: Some thoughts around the "is Perl code maintainable" discussionby erroneousBollock (Curate) |
on Aug 13, 2007 at 05:04 UTC ( #632135=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I have almost the same versions. I see breakage that seems to be caused by mis-parses of string termination... not vim-bad... but still broken ;) Could you post that screenshot somewhere so that I may compare it? Update: Is it possible that I've mis-configured something and it's falling back to perl-mode ? I'll be the first to admit I'm not an emacs expert. Only really been using it for 3 months (to play with lisp and slime). I'm much more comfortable in vim (even with its really weak syntax-highlighting). I've been using it for 10+ years so it's just what I'm used to i guess. My fingers are still not used to hitting the control/alt-keys so much.
Update 2: Latest ntemacs and latest cperl-mode (+ actually following instructions) seems quite fine. Thanks grep, for making me check my facts! -David.
In Section
Meditations
|
|