|
in reply to Re: pod6 --- code+pod suggestion
in thread pod6 --- code+pod suggestion
Though that's useful, that doesn't seem to be the same thing. The OP was asking for a way to have code embedded in the docs, and still be treated as code. What you're talking about seems to be a way to access the docs as data from within code. Now, you might be able to get there from here (read the docs, parse out the code, and run eval), but at the very best that's ugly. |
Re^3: pod6 --- code+pod suggestion
by jdporter (Paladin) on Dec 19, 2006 at 17:27 UTC
|
Oh, yeah, you're right.
In that case I think it's safe to say that RFC 79 was implicitly rejected, if not outright ignored.
We're building the house of the future together.
| [reply] |
|
