Re^2: Is it real? (mu)
by greenFox (Vicar) on Jun 01, 2006 at 07:12 UTC
|
Agreed, so I took a vote each way for "true love" :-)
-- Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Seek what they sought. -Basho
| [reply] |
Re^2: Is it real? (mu)
by apotheon (Deacon) on Jun 01, 2006 at 18:33 UTC
|
I'd expect a programmer to understand how it is interpreted as roughly equivalent to "Which is (the most) real?" — just think of "it" as a variable! Sure, it doesn't start with a dollar sign, but not all variables are in Perl.
it = "Bigfoot";
print "Is it real?";
output:
Is Bigfoot real?
print substr("Just another Perl hacker", 0, -2); |
|
- apotheon
CopyWrite Chad Perrin |
| [reply] [d/l] |
|
That would explain why voting for Bigfoot would be voting for "Is Bigfoot real?", but does not explain why such a vote would be interpretted as voting for "Bigfoot is real". If people appeared to be interpretting the poll as "I most like to question the reality of _", then I might buy your argument. As is, it looks like "logic as a second language". ;)
| [reply] |
|
Ah, but: keep in mind that in Perl (as well as some other languages) having any positive value at all causes a variable to evaluate as "true" when tested for "truth". Thus, a vote for "Is Bigfoot real?" assigns it a value that evaluates as "true", aka "yes".
Or something.
DWIM, darn you! DWIM!
print substr("Just another Perl hacker", 0, -2); |
|
- apotheon
CopyWrite Chad Perrin |
| [reply] |
Re^2: Is it real? (mu)
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 02, 2006 at 21:36 UTC
|
It's a bad poll.
It asks about the reality of something; without listing what that something refers to. Then it lists a bunch of things that some people believe are real, and others don't.
What if I believe in everything on the list except two are real? I would probably vote for one of them -- but which one?
What if I believe that nothing on the list except two are real? Again, I would probably vote for one of them -- and again, which one should I vote for?
It's a bad poll. It doesn't present a set of mutually exclusive options with an opinion-based decision critera to choose among them; which is the whole point of a poll. | [reply] |
|
You're taking this whole poll thing waaaay too seriously. Next, you'll complain it's not scientific.
(For the record, I don't care for the polls, so I simply don't vote for them. That doesn't mean I whine about the things I don't like about 'em - I just change the channel and move on. Obviously, I read the replies once in a while, especially when I don't remember that the thread is a poll instead of a SoPW or Meditation.)
| [reply] |
|
You're taking this whole poll thing waaaay too seriously.
Basic spelling, grammar, and logic are the minimum requirements for proper social interaction: it's rude to force other people to guess at your meaning, to be deliberately unclear, or to speak or reason incorrectly; it suggest that you don't care enough about your peers to spend the time to do it right.
I don't know what's happening to people's manners and morals, but it isn't good.
| [reply] |
|