Re^3: Trouble installing Tree::Simple::Visitor::FindByPath

You can try a 'force install' via CPAN.pm (it's documented), or do 'make install' manually in your ~/.cpan directory. You can also try the last suggestion in my previous message and ignore the fact that a few of the tests failed. I have never used Tree::Simple::*, so I can't advise whether the tests which fail are significant. Your next port of call if you have trouble with it once you have it installed is the module authors/maintainers.

Comment on Re^3: Trouble installing Tree::Simple::Visitor::FindByPath

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Trouble installing Tree::Simple::Visitor::FindByPath by SkipHuffman (Monk) on Nov 01, 2005 at 19:34 UTC
Thanks. I was hoping to avoid a "force" I don't honestly know what this is doing (nor do I specifically care). It is a requirement for Catalyst. I don't know what Catalyst is looking for from this, so I hate to ignore an error. I probably need to pester the module maintainer. again thank you. Skip	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: Trouble installing Tree::Simple::Visitor::FindByPath by virtualsue (Vicar) on Nov 01, 2005 at 19:43 UTC
You'll move forward rather faster if you do the force install and ask the maintainer about the errors at the same time. ~~Better yet~~ Additionally, you could ask the Catalyst tribe on the #catalyst irc channel or their mailing list. There are 100s of tests in the Tree::Simple bundle and it is very possible that a few of them are not correct.	[reply]
Re^6: Trouble installing Tree::Simple::Visitor::FindByPath by SkipHuffman (Monk) on Nov 01, 2005 at 20:12 UTC
Which IRC server does #catalyst hang out on. I am having trouble finding it, but then IRC is not my strong area. Skip	[reply] [d/l]
Re^7: Trouble installing Tree::Simple::Visitor::FindByPath by SkipHuffman (Monk) on Nov 01, 2005 at 20:15 UTC
Re^6: Trouble installing Tree::Simple::Visitor::FindByPath by SkipHuffman (Monk) on Nov 01, 2005 at 19:53 UTC
Thanks. That sounds like a good direction. I tend to be a person that either knows every single thing that is going on, or I accept all the defaults. Anything in between feels hazardous. Skip	[reply]


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks