![]() |
|
Welcome to the Monastery | |
PerlMonks |
Re^3: Perl not BNF-able??by adamk (Chaplain) |
on Jul 02, 2005 at 08:32 UTC ( #471893=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Since I wrote PPI, I probably have struggled against more anti-BNF things that most. So here's a few. 1. Source Filters You can't handle source filters in BNF for obvious reasons. 2. BEGIN blocks You can't (code) parse Perl without also executing it. That code is legal Perl every day of the year except for Christmas, when it is not legal Perl code. 3. Cannot be parsed when isolated That code could mean either function('foo'), 'bar' or function( 'foo', 'bar' ) depending on what is in the Some module. If Some.pm isn't installed on your machine, how are you to know. PPI does what it does using more evil than Perl itself, and certainly more heuristics. It makes up for it's guesses by promising that what it writes out is ALWAYS character for character identical to what it read in, unless you change something. So if it has a problem, it won't break as long as you don't change that part of the tree. There's probably more reasons, but for me those are the big three.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|