Re: Should PM have a Puzzles Corner?
by tye (Sage) on May 16, 2005 at 01:38 UTC
|
Adding another section to fight over what goes where doesn't appeal to me. Poetry and Obfuscation should be merged into a single section that encompasses those, golf, puzzles, etc.
| [reply] |
|
Trivial Pursuits
...except that people who know of the game by the same name might mistake it for a section dedicated to the discussion of Perl trivia; Larry-isms, little known developments, and so on.
tye is on the right track though. The first thing I thought when I saw the parent node was, "Obfuscation and Puzzlers", but that wouldn't implicitly invite the Perl Poets' participation. In principle it makes a whole lot of sense to combine Obfu, Poetry, Golf, and Puzzlers into one section, but unless you call it "Obfu, Poetry, Golf, and Puzzlers", the section will probably fail to attract all such posts.
| [reply] |
|
Named "Edutainment"? "The Lighter Side"? Can't think of a Monestary-related term.
| [reply] |
|
I think "The Heap" is closer what tye has in mind... ;-)
I can see the affinity between obfus/japhs and puzzles, but poems and puzzles seem like an odd mix to me.
| [reply] |
|
|
|
|
| [reply] |
|
Diversions?
Game Room?
Rumpus Room?
Luditorium?1
1I kind of made that one up, but surprisingly Google turns up a few hits, including one that describes it as a "posh word for 'Play Zone'".
| [reply] |
|
|
Perhaps
Cloister - an open area, often grassed, sometimes with a fountain in the centre or
Calefactory - a warming room
both these would seem to be places that would allow loitering and idle chat.
| [reply] |
Re: Should PM have a Puzzles Corner?
by ambrus (Abbot) on May 16, 2005 at 10:38 UTC
|
There's MJD's perl qotw,
but it's not working well because there're not enough
volunteers to actually create the
puzzles and evaluate the solutions.
| [reply] |
|
I don't think it would be necessary to have volunteers to evaluate the solutions, any more than we have volunteers now to evaluate golf entries or anything else.
Whether puzzles would be submitted frequently enough is a harder question. You may be right that there may not be enough of them to warrant a separate section, which argues in favor of tye's consolidation idea.
| [reply] |
Re: Should PM have a Puzzles Corner?
by TedPride (Priest) on May 16, 2005 at 02:54 UTC
|
A puzzles section would be fun, I think - and should definitely be separate from poetry and obfuscation. Golf could go in the puzzles section as well, since its purpose is to figure out the shortest possible solution, not be as confusing as possible. The two don't always correspond. | [reply] |
Re: Should PM have a Puzzles Corner?
by displeaser (Hermit) on May 20, 2005 at 09:20 UTC
|
Hi,
personally I think it would be a good idea. Theres oft times when finished with my daily scriptures that I like to play with perl to try and learn something new. Obviously I can read through the normal posts but sometimes it's a bit to much like work :-( Fun diversion's would be nice and inspirational and collected together would suit my tired (read lazy) head :-) D | [reply] |