Re: Compaq's WebL language

I just had a look at it, and I must say:
Yuck!!!
It look's a bit like the worst of Pascal and ECMAScript rolled into one.

Why not stay with Perl for doing thing like this? You will probably end up needing a full language to do anything serious, and then you will have to reinvent Perl!

Comment on Re: Compaq's WebL language

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Compaq's WebL language by mojotoad (Monsignor) on Aug 26, 2004 at 20:47 UTC
I agree that it's not pretty -- perl is better suited for most, if not all, of the tasks it accomplishes. What I had in mind was leveraging existing WeBL scripts, or translating them. Also, if you look at the problem space that WeBL addresses, it serves as a good source of sign posts for the sort of constructs you'd want for a general purpose web-weasel language. Matt	[reply]


Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
	PerlMonks