The image is not in any way original (not that it was claimed to be), being as it was linked from Salon.com at some point this month in an article about cellphone technology ( the image). And since it isn't original, I fail to see the value of wrapping it in three lines of Perl and calling it a JAPH. Or JAHPH.
I got a warning from Salon before I hit the link. If you just have to post pr0n to the monastery, I'd appreciate some sort of notice (prior to loading) that your post contains explicit images of females. Thanks!
e-mail neshura | Sure but whatsit worth to ya?
In reply to Re: JAHPH
by neshura
in thread JAHPH
by azatoth
-
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
-
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
<u> <ul>
-
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
intervention).
-
Want more info? How to link
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.
|
