![]() |
|
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
So I'm determined to do it
the hard way, so that at the end (if there is an end),
Doing it the hard way is a time-honored tradition :) I just suggested you check out how the others work so that you can steal good ideas & interfaces. is the long string in your penultimate line a single scalar for all purposes? You mean $character{'Bob the Fighter'}->{'Attributes'}->{'Str'}? Yes, because in the end it is just a value stored in a hash, and only scalars can be thus stored. By dereferencing part of that mess, you can get a hash. For example, %{ $character{'Bob the Fighter'}->{'Attributes'} } is the Attributes hash. (The scalar value $characters{'Bob the Fighter'}->{'Attributes'} is a reference to a hash. the %{ } dereferences the reference. Could I include lists in that hash by reference? Absolutely. A reference to anything is a scalar, and a hash can store a scalar. An anonymous list can be created by [], or you can use the backslash reference. So: both work just fine. You can then access them like: Remember that although we're using a hash as our "base" variable here, we could use any other data type that is appropriate. A list could work: as could a scalar: (Assuming you had stored the data in that fashion.) If, for example, $character{'Bob'}->{'Class'} holds 'Ftr', and $class{'Ftr'}->{'Base Attack'} holds 'Good' (to indicate that fighters have Good attack bonuses, which are generated by a short procedure in the combat module), what would be the code to retrieve Bob's Base Attack type? Well, $class{$character{'Bob'}->{'class'}}->{'Base Attack'} would be equal to $class{'Ftr'->{'Base Attack'} (actually, it would _BE_ the same, since all that happens is $character{'Bob'}->{'Class'} resolves to 'Ftr') However, this assumes that Bob's class will ALWAYS have an entry in %class. Storing feats, spells, etc. as booleans is not efficient, IMHO. I want to be able to brew a new feat and not have to go and set the bit in all the PCs.) Just so you know, Perl handles non-existant hash keys quite nicely, and it's quite common to see code that would be like: If Bob doesn't have that feat, you don't have to set it to 0, you simply don't set it to a true value, and it will evaluate False. (Well, undefined, which in turn is false) In reply to Re: Re: Re: Daft text adventure project
by swiftone
|
|