comment on

I think 632756 is a good example of a problematic thread for a 'solved' tag.

The question had been asked and answered, but I thought there was still more to the issue and said so. Maybe I didn't help the OP (maybe I did?) but I got a /msg from another monk to thank me for that node, so it was of some value.

It can be frustrating to find that things have already been covered when you visit a thread, but i think thats only a problem because of page load time, to be honest.

ObTangent: without wishing to complain in any way shape or form (I love this site to death - and I'm very thankful to the people who keep it running), is there a known reason for the long-ish page load times? If not, is there anything I could do to help? (This sort of thing is my day job, presumably along with many other monks).

In reply to Re: Marking nodes as solved? by jbert
in thread Marking nodes as solved? by suaveant

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Keep It Simple, Stupid
	PerlMonks