I make a living doing the *other* kind of testing: acceptance tests, system tests, functional tests, whatever you want to call it. (Sometimes erroneously called "QA".)

I don't think that the first purpose of unit tests is to find bugs. I think that the first purpose of unit tests is to provide some assurance to the programmer, the maintainer, and the tester that the code in question is in fact sane. That the code has been exercised in some reasonable and thoughtful fashion before being inflicted on the user (whoever that is).

Put another way: write enough unit tests to prove to yourself and to those who come after you that you really did pay some attention while you were coding. You can't write a test that will catch every bug. Trying to do so is a waste of time.

Put yet another way: as a programmer, your job is the trees; as a tester/QA guy, my job is the forest. We're both walking around in the same woods, but we're paying attention in very different ways.

---

---

• Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
• Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:

  <code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>

• Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
• Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.