go ahead... be a heretic | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
To me, the use of negative voting is, in effect, to say that the post is either:
- Off-topic - Uses foul language - Is insulting - Significantly detracts from the subject matter That's about it. I see this comment as being a typical newbie question. I think it would have been more appropriate to reply with a RTFM-like response, with a link to where the answer could be found. Perhaps even a recommendation that the newbie get the Camel book. It does make me wonder what the policy here is on negative voting. Voting down nodes that are just simple is a valid way of using the system, but that's not how I see it. What does everyone else think? In reply to RE: Abusive Negative Voting
by Shendal
|
|