"be consistent" | |
PerlMonks |
Re: Re: Regex (lookahead) Confusionby ChrisR (Hermit) |
on Feb 06, 2004 at 13:24 UTC ( [id://327057]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Thanks. You're right, using the * instead of the + allows the regex to return true if the string is blank. I did want to be sure that string contained at least one of the allowed characters.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|