Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

RE: Perl6 RFCs

by gnat (Beadle)
on Sep 02, 2000 at 04:42 UTC ( [id://30839]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Perl6 RFCs

Yeah, their sheer number leaves me speechless, too :-)

http://dev.perl.org/rfc

When you read them, bear in mind:

  • An RFC isn't an accepted standard, it's just an idea someone had. Not every RFC will be accepted.
  • Larry will (is) reading them, and will decide what are good ideas and what are the byproduct of crack smoking.
  • There are many different ways one might do something, so there are often many different RFCs on similar topics. This isn't necessarily bad. There are sometimes even two RFCs, one proposing something and the other specifically proposing *not* doing it. The RFCs will help Larry decide.
  • The RFCs are discussed on mailing lists. See http://dev.perl.org
My favourite suggestion so far isn't even in an RFC. Larry wants to make "..." valid Perl:
if (...) { ... }
will actually compile. When "..." is reached at runtime, though, Perl will die saying "you left unimplemented stub code in your program".

I love Perl!

Nat

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE (tilly) 2: Perl6 RFCs
by tilly (Archbishop) on Sep 02, 2000 at 15:33 UTC
    Cute!

    But it would be more useful for me if there was also the ability to let strict have a "stubs" option to catch them at compile time anyways. :-)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://30839]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (2)
As of 2024-04-26 06:00 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found