The AMs have every right to remain anonymous, and it doesn't reflect very well on you to turn around and attack their anonynimity. They raised a valid point, being that you have a history of selling the type of information you are attempting to glean from the community at large here. Had that post not been there I would have never known.

I have no idea about your business history, nor your reputation on the 'Net, but had that AM not spoken up I simply would not have thought twice about what might happen with the information provided.

With that said, if this is an attempt to glean information to sell to possible clients in the future it would be good to state so up front. Im not attepting to pass judgement. It simply that some people in the opensource community might take offense that information provided free of charge by them could then be used to turn a profit later.

I believe that that is the point the AM was attempting to state, though they can correct me if they so choose.

MMMMM... Chocolaty Perl Goodness.....