|P is for Practical|
Re: Macros, LFSPs and LFMsby BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Jun 11, 2003 at 19:23 UTC||Need Help??|
The "should we, shouldn't we" debate seems to be yet another sterile academic debate from my perspective, but maybe I'm missing something. Whilst I remember making a few rods for my own back with the C macro facility, mostly related to writing macros that had side-effects, I have also seen them put to very good use.
Does anyone with a strong opinion against adding macro facilities care to give a few reasons?
On the other hand, I'd also like to see a few examples of what people would use a macro facility for in Perl. Assuming that p5 had a C-like
I think that's roughly the syntax
What would you use it for?
Examine what is said, not who speaks."Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." -Richard Buckminster Fuller