Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: (podmaster) Re: We have no SPL.

by educated_foo (Vicar)
on May 06, 2002 at 09:12 UTC ( [id://164258]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: (podmaster) Re: We have no SPL.
in thread We have no SPL.

That said, wrapping one particular library-based implementation of a priority queue to work on standard Perl SVs would be very interesting, and quite possibly useful, too.
That would be the idea -- something along the lines of a priority_queue<SV*,vector<SV*>,comparison_func> . Making it "nice" would require it being possible to pass a block of Perl code in as the comparison function (a la sort), which completely blows the inlining. Standard comparisons (e.g. string and numeric greater- and less-than) could still be specified as constants passed to the constructor, and implemented in pure C for speed. It would be interesting to see how much faster this would be than the Perl-only versions.

/s

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://164258]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (2)
As of 2024-04-26 00:45 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found