Re: Re: forking in winblows ?

The dir command is just a simplified example on what is causing the problem in my larger script, and I don't think this has to do anything with the file system because if i was to replace:

my @output = `$dir_cmd`;

with a system call

system("$dir_cmd");

it works with even a 100 process's in parallel, the reason I son't want to use a system call is because I want to get the output and store it within a file

I even looked trying something like this:

system ("$dir_cmd >> out.txt");

but the output comes all mangled up, with so many process's trying to write to the same file at once, so I just store the output in a variable, and then copy it to the file within the smae child process, and it works for me in UNIX.

Comment on Re: Re: forking in winblows ?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: forking in winblows ? by Mr. Muskrat (Canon) on Apr 25, 2002 at 16:52 UTC
So why not put the commands into a batch file and pipe the output of the commands to a file? `test.bat -------- dir c:\some\path\ >>c:\path\to\test.txt` [download] then use the system call and read the output in perl: `system("c:\path\to\test.bat"); open(OUTPUT, "<c:/path/to/test.txt") \|\| die "couln't open ...yadda..." +; @output=<OUTPUT>; close(OUTPUT);` [download] Just my $0.02. Matthew Musgrove Who says that programmers can't work in the Marketing Department? Or is that who says that Marketing people can't program?	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re: Re: Re: forking in winblows ? by graff (Chancellor) on Apr 26, 2002 at 05:52 UTC
I even looked trying something like this: system ("$dir_cmd >> out.txt"); but the output comes all mangled up, with so many process's trying to write to the same file Did you try something like this: `system( "$dir_cmd > out$i.txt" );` [download] so that each thread would write to a different output file? Or, since you just want to read output from commands that are running in subshells, have you looked at creating an array of file handles that open "$dir_cmd \|"? I haven't tried it, but I expect it would be possible (maybe even really simple) to loop over that array of handles doing non-blocking reads until their all done. (But I'm not running my windows partition just now, so I'd have to try it some other time...)	[reply] [d/l]


Think about Loose Coupling
	PerlMonks