Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re: One more perl programmer's take on Ruby (discussion)

by snapdragon (Monk)
on Nov 19, 2001 at 18:40 UTC ( [id://126270]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to One more perl programmer's take on Ruby (discussion)

I had a quick look at Ruby a little while ago. Now I know that it's unfair to make judgements about languages without using them in anger to actually *see* the benefits and costs. However what struck me at the time (and I think it's still kinda true) is that Ruby's did not offer clear benefits over the existing solutions.

For instance, take a look at Ruby's comparison page. It's improvements over Perl are: nicer syntax, different default scoping, cleaner integration of object-orientedness. The first two hardly make for a decisive argument. The OO integration model is nicer than Perl but I don't think that this alone make for a compelling argument to switch to Ruby.

I might be prejudiced here, but I basically believe that many who like Perl do so because it's a very free-form language, suitable for quick hacks. Thats my 2 cents anyway.

However as I mentioned at the top I have never taken a significant amount of time to try and implement anything in Ruby. What about anybody else? Does anyone with experience of Perl and Ruby want to share their feelings?

  • Comment on Re: One more perl programmer's take on Ruby (discussion)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://126270]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (2)
As of 2024-04-26 01:38 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found