Re^2: DBI::Class relationship naming

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: DBI::Class relationship naming by Beatnik (Parson) on Jan 01, 2017 at 19:47 UTC
That would be the easy explanation.. Unfortunately, the production fieldnames are 20+ characters long and the behavior is the same. Greetz Beatnik ... I'm belgian but I don't play one on TV.	[reply]
Re^4: DBI::Class relationship naming by soonix (Canon) on Jan 02, 2017 at 21:53 UTC
I know that Postgres can handle names of 64 characters, but in the code above you call it a method. I know next to nothing about DBIC, but if it uses XS/C/C++, there could happen some name mangling on the way from field name to method name. Does the problem persist, when the names differ already in the first few characters?	[reply]
Re^5: DBI::Class relationship naming by Beatnik (Parson) on Jan 03, 2017 at 21:10 UTC
My 2 tables use different field names.. So table1 has a field identitygroupname, pointing to another table, properly mapped with a table relationship. table2 has a field identitygroups, pointing to another table, properly mapped with a table relationship. `my $foo = $t1->identitygroupname->name; my $bar = $t2->identitygroup->name;` [download] The belongs_to definition in DBIC::Schema::Result::T1 looks like this: `__PACKAGE__->belongs_to( "fieldwith", "DBIC::Schema::Result::R1", { id => "fieldwiths" }, { is_deferrable => 0, join_type => "LEFT", on_delete => "NO ACTION", on_update => "NO ACTION", }, );` [download] I'm not sure if this is a bug in dbicdump or something on purpose. I very much doubt that this is a Postgresql issue. Greetz Beatnik ... I'm belgian but I don't play one on TV.	[reply] [d/l] [select]


Syntactic Confectionery Delight
	PerlMonks