Re^4: makefile.mk is missing with Perl 5.34.0 distro.

Can you please tell me what's going on here ...

The intention of the patch is to alter the settings of INST_TOP, CCHOME, and EMAIL.
You could alter those settings in the GNUmakefile by hand if you like.
However, a better solution IMO, is to leave the GNUmakefile in its original state and run:

gmake INST_TOP=C:\perl_app\bin\Perl CCHOME=C:\msys64\mingw64 EMAIL=cus
+tomer_support@xyz.com
gmake test INST_TOP=C:\perl_app\bin\Perl CCHOME=C:\msys64\mingw64 EMAI
+L=customer_support@xyz.com
gmake install INST_TOP=C:\perl_app\bin\Perl CCHOME=C:\msys64\mingw64 E
+MAIL=customer_support@xyz.com
[download]

do I need to modify the makefile.patch file

If you want to make your configurational changes by running patch then yes, you will need a different patch file.
The current patch is not written for the GNUmakefile.
For example, the line

#EMAIL        *=
[download]

does not exist in GNUmakefile. Instead GNUmakefile contains:

#EMAIL        :=
[download]

and that line needs to be changed to:

EMAIL        := customer_support@xyz.com
[download]

not to:

EMAIL        *= customer_support@xyz.com
[download]

Also, the numbers in the lines like @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ etc. are all wrong for the GNUmakefile.

Cheers,
Rob

Comment on Re^4: makefile.mk is missing with Perl 5.34.0 distro. Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: makefile.mk is missing with Perl 5.34.0 distro. by Anonymous Monk on Aug 25, 2021 at 18:15 UTC
Thank you for the reply, I have changed the makefile.patch file accordingly and changed the line numbers as per GNUmakefile, but not all 3 hunks are successful at a time. Is there any specific format I need to follow to get all 3 hunks successful? How can I get a new makefie.patch file for GNUmakefile? Thank you.	[reply]
Re^6: makefile.mk is missing with Perl 5.34.0 distro. by Corion (Patriarch) on Aug 25, 2021 at 18:26 UTC
The traditional way of creating patch files is the `diff` program: You copy the old file to a backup filename (say, `GNUmakefile.org`) You edit the `GNUmakefilke` You create the patch file: `diff -Naur GNUmakefile.org GNUmakefile >mypatch.path`	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^6: makefile.mk is missing with Perl 5.34.0 distro. by syphilis (Archbishop) on Aug 26, 2021 at 01:08 UTC
I have changed the makefile.patch file accordingly and changed the line numbers as per GNUmakefile, but not all 3 hunks are successful at a time When you follow Corion's instructions then, based on your original patch file, you should end up with something like: --- GNUmakefile_orig 2021-08-26 10:43:41 +1000 +++ GNUmakefile 2021-08-26 10:46:03 +1000 @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ # newly built perl. # INST_DRV := c: -INST_TOP := $(INST_DRV)\perl +INST_TOP := $(INST_DRV)\perl_app\bin\Perl # # Uncomment if you want to build a 32-bit Perl using a 32-bit compile +r @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ # For GCC builds this should be the directory containing the bin, inc +lude, # lib directories for your compiler. # -#CCHOME := C:\MinGW +#CCHOME := C:\msys64\mingw64 # # Additional compiler flags can be specified here. @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ # set this to your email address (perl will guess a value from # your loginname and your hostname, which may not be right) # -#EMAIL := +#EMAIL := customer_support@xyz.com ## ## Build configuration ends. [download] And that should be fine for as long as the GNUmakefile that ships with the perl source does not change. It's best to ensure that the final GNUmakefile contains unix line endings (not windows line endings) - otherwise a couple of the t/porting test files in the perl test suite will report failures. I would run `dos2unix GNUmakefile` before building perl, just to be sure. It's probably also important to make sure that the line endings of the GNUmakefile you're patching (which are initially unix style) matches the line endings of the patch file, otherwise the patch might not apply. Perhaps `patch` has a switch that will ignore differences in line endings (like `diff`'s `-w` switch) ... I don't know. Otherwise, `dos2unix` and `unix2dos` are useful friends to have. Cheers, Rob	[reply] [d/l] [select]


Just another Perl shrine
	PerlMonks