Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re^2: Negative voting

by sundialsvc4 (Abbot)
on Aug 09, 2013 at 16:20 UTC ( #1048796=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Negative voting
in thread Negative voting

If I could reply to that ... straight-up-and-down and without fear (which BTW I don’t have) of “downvotes” ... my very simple reply would be this:  

“It does not help me at all,” because:

  • I have no idea why you did it.   (Do you object to the content, or to the author, or are you (were you, five years ago...) just having a bad hair day?)
  • If I am searching for this thread, three years hence, your “(up/down)vote” adds absolutely no semantics (tags, attributes, etc...) to the thread.

WikiPedia might be the best illustration of what might usefully be done:   a system for commenting about the content, expressed as categories that can be tabulated.   A “vote” is merely a number, unless it is paired with attributes and intended to be useful “for years to come.”

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1048796]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (2)
As of 2020-08-13 21:17 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Which rocket would you take to Mars?

    Results (75 votes). Check out past polls.