http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=11132634


in reply to Re^9: "" but true
in thread "" but true

doesn't help anyone and keeps those needlessly busy who aim for high information quality on this site

Lanx that is a perfect description of the majority of your voluminous bloviating on this site, be it:

Besides, who made you the arbiter of how serious a tone a poster must use in a discussion on this discussion site? You of all people, whose 'jokes' posted outnumber working programs posted by orders of magnitude?

Hope this helps!


The way forward always starts with a minimal test.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^11: "" but true
by LanX (Saint) on May 15, 2021 at 20:48 UTC

      "again" what? I called you neither pompous nor an ass. I simply pointed out that you are among the last people who should be harassing Bod or anyone over the quality of their posts.

      $ perl xpe.pl --sort_by posts --recent 2 --min_posts 1000 --no_adjust +--order desc +--------------------------------------------------------------------- +-----------------+ | Pos | St. | Monk name | XP | Level | Age | XP/Age | +Posts | XP/Posts | +--------------------------------------------------------------------- +-----------------+ | 1 43 FunkyMonk 35,059 Chancellor (21) 5,136 7.9003 + 1,024 34.2373 | | 2 21 Athanasius 50,601 Archbishop (23) 3,301 17.7395 + 1,964 25.7643 | | 3 32 eyepopslikeam 42,749 Bishop (22) 6,901 7.1690 + 1,716 24.9120 | | 4 51 talexb 29,602 Canon (20) 7,094 4.8296 + 2,172 13.6289 | | 5 59 afoken 27,178 Canon (20) 4,459 7.0544 + 2,046 13.2835 | | 6 22 syphilis 48,484 Bishop (22) 5,595 10.0286 + 3,756 12.9084 | | 7 36 hippo 38,426 Chancellor (21) 3,756 11.8401 + 3,026 12.6986 | | 8 27 kcott 46,190 Bishop (22) 3,888 13.7502 + 3,667 12.5961 | | 9 28 haukex 46,115 Bishop (22) 4,070 13.1128 + 3,666 12.5791 | | 10 70 johngg 24,731 Canon (20) 6,050 4.7308 + 1,978 12.5030 | | 11 25 toolic 46,810 Bishop (22) 5,079 10.6666 + 3,776 12.3967 | | 12 3 Corion 154,211 Pope (28) 7,732 23.0830 +12,597 12.2419 | | 13 10 davido 64,018 Cardinal (24) 6,493 11.4114 + 5,264 12.1615 | | 14 20 Your Mother 50,909 Archbishop (23) 6,616 8.9056 + 4,187 12.1588 | | 15 106 derby 17,749 Abbot (19) 7,690 2.6713 + 1,474 12.0414 | | 16 138 dave_the_m 13,551 Monsignor (18) 6,254 2.5075 + 1,128 12.0133 | | 17 39 roboticus 37,565 Chancellor (21) 5,553 7.8291 + 3,256 11.5372 | | 18 156 dsheroh 12,425 Monsignor (18) 6,952 2.0685 + 1,084 11.4622 | | 19 83 Tux 22,180 Canon (20) 6,808 3.7706 + 1,951 11.3685 | | 20 5 GrandFather 81,496 Saint (26) 5,828 16.1825 + 7,182 11.3473 | | 21 7 merlyn 71,352 Sage (25) 7,689 10.7391 + 6,325 11.2809 | | 22 166 BillKSmith 11,518 Prior (17) 3,358 3.9699 + 1,027 11.2152 | | 23 89 1nickt 21,171 Abbot (19) 2,163 11.3252 + 1,974 10.7249 | | 24 57 bart 27,565 Canon (20) 6,846 4.6600 + 2,645 10.4216 | | 25 130 mr_mischief 14,283 Monsignor (18) 7,375 2.2415 + 1,383 10.3275 | | 26 94 Discipulus 19,364 Abbot (19) 6,911 3.2427 + 1,876 10.3220 | | 27 65 NetWallah 25,120 Canon (20) 6,968 4.1724 + 2,551 9.8471 | | 28 13 chromatic 59,605 Archbishop (23) 7,813 8.8293 + 6,088 9.7906 | | 29 38 Fletch 38,251 Chancellor (21) 7,395 5.9860 + 3,955 9.6716 | | 30 96 kennethk 19,191 Abbot (19) 4,622 4.8056 + 2,014 9.5288 | | 31 11 marto 62,294 Cardinal (24) 6,317 11.4134 + 6,584 9.4614 | | 32 17 choroba 56,175 Archbishop (23) 4,061 16.0091 + 6,000 9.3625 | | 33 170 bliako 11,185 Prior (17) 1,799 7.1948 + 1,228 9.1083 | | 34 26 AnomalousMonk 46,480 Bishop (22) 5,015 10.7257 + 5,115 9.0870 | | 35 110 poj 17,207 Abbot (19) 6,719 2.9639 + 1,939 8.8742 | | 36 116 holli 16,273 Abbot (19) 6,642 2.8356 + 1,842 8.8344 | | 37 112 karlgoethebie 16,794 Abbot (19) 3,116 6.2372 + 1,957 8.5815 | | 38 82 salva 22,355 Canon (20) 5,880 4.4002 + 2,640 8.4678 | | 39 132 jwkrahn 14,263 Monsignor (18) 5,524 2.9881 + 1,687 8.4547 | | 40 69 stevieb 24,974 Canon (20) 4,287 6.7422 + 2,961 8.4343 | | 41 53 jdporter 29,327 Canon (20) 6,925 4.9014 + 3,529 8.3103 | | 42 143 hdb 13,426 Monsignor (18) 2,993 5.1912 + 1,640 8.1866 | | 43 66 tobyink 25,085 Canon (20) 4,416 6.5746 + 3,136 7.9990 | | 44 91 ambrus 20,709 Abbot (19) 6,436 3.7239 + 2,799 7.3987 | | 45 219 QM 8,734 Parson (16) 6,441 1.5694 + 1,199 7.2844 | | 46 8 LanX 68,266 Cardinal (24) 4,637 17.0380 +10,111 6.7517 | | 47 4 ikegami 136,760 Pope (28) 6,122 25.8542 +20,831 6.5652 | | 48 81 Marshall 22,938 Canon (20) 4,523 5.8692 + 3,557 6.4487 | | 49 118 sundialsvc4 16,168 Abbot (19) 4,946 3.7828 + 4,667 3.4643 | +--------------------------------------------------------------------- +-----------------+
      (Ranking the Saints by XP Efficiency)


      The way forward always starts with a minimal test.

        46 8 LanX 47 4 ikegami 48 81 Marshall 49 118 sundialsvc4

        LanX, I expect you're well-satisfied to make the top 50 ... and proud of being a full three spots ahead of your hero sundialsvc4.

        Sorry, but any list of top 50 all time monks that has eyepopslikeamosquito in third place has no credibility. As if that were not enough, the inexplicable appearance of sundialsvc4 in the top 50 had me checking if the date of the post was early April.

        I was further surprised by the non-appearance of PM legends Erudil and brian_d_foy. While Erudil only made 13 posts, they all garnered over 100 XP, their current node reps being: 793, 667, 415, 373, 320, 225, 211, 210, 205, 159, 144, 116, 104.

        Two more pieces of PM arcana:

        Sigh ... since many people tend to believe in such "science", here some background:

        • Going into deeper discussions, like foolishly replying at level 13 (sic) destroys the XP/Post ratio.
        • Coming late to the party too, since the voting average is deflating over the years°

        Here some "alternative" facts: ²

        • Your top 5% posts (98) range between 56 and 31
        • Bod's top 5% posts (23) range between 28 and 15
        • My top 5% posts (506) range between 70 and 28

        Let's put this into relation with your alleged "top-monk" (which I respect nevertheless)

        • FunkyMonk's top 5% posts (54) range between 108 and 38 ³

        But well ... this doesn't prove that I'm not saying foolish things from time to time ...

        So please show me those threads where I stated anything like ...

        > "That really shouldn't be allowed"

        ... without giving plenty of evidence, links and even example code?

        I think I also tend to reply to every new argument without resorting to a cheap "you know I'm kidding"

        According to your "statistic" this should be an easy game ...

        Cheers Rolf
        (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
        Wikisyntax for the Monastery

        °) eyepopslikeamosquito can tell you more about it. Ask yourself, how comes 30% of the top 20 saints haven't been here for years without loosing rank?

        update

        And one also gets XP for voting, which makes it even more complicated.

        ²) NB: this isn't adjusted to the deflation over the years, because that's not easily done. But it was always consensus that "XP is only a game" anyway.

        ³) he barely passed your 1000 posts minimum, because he has only 10% of my volume. But if you look at my 54th best post you'll see a reputation of 40 and his 506th only at 16.

        For more How to Lie with Statistics