This is PerlMonks "Mobile"

Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  


in reply to Re: Matching a string in a parenthesized block (regex help)
in thread Matching a string in a parenthesized block (regex help)

Now that you mention it, I think the slurp mode fixed my little program.

*edit*

Actually no it seems like it wants to match greedily all the way down to the end of the file... I will check the other responses. For instance it wants to look outside ASDF and will match the other blocks if it has plz_match

  • Comment on Re^2: Matching a string in a parenthesized block (regex help)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Matching a string in a parenthesized block (regex help)
by LanX (Saint) on Mar 06, 2021 at 01:34 UTC
    Look at my regex, I made both .*? non-greedy.

    jwkrahn's solution isn't bad either, if your records are that consistent.

    Edit

    Though [^}]*? is certainly better for more complex input.

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
    Wikisyntax for the Monastery

      Sorry I should have clarified a bit more. Here is an example file I'm working with.

      ASDF_ONE { magic tmp tmp } ASDF_TWO { tmp tmp tmp } string3 { tmp tmp magic }

      Some sections have a common prefix, like ASDF_. I want a function in my program to scan a specific section for the magic word using an argument. The function returns true if word is found, else returns false. See code below for how I want to structure this:

      use warnings; use strict; my $file = "/path/to/file.txt"; sub has_word { my $arg = $_[0]; local $/; open FILE, '<', $file; while ( <FILE> ) { if ( m/(ASDF_$arg \{)(.*?)magic(.*?)(\})/s ) { close FILE; return 1; } else { close FILE; return 0; } } } sub main { if (has_word("ONE")) { print "ONE already has the word.\n"; } else { print "ONE does not have the word.\n"; } if (has_word("TWO")) { print "TWO already has the word.\n"; } else { print "TWO does not have the word.\n"; } } main;

      The output I get is:

      ONE already has the word. TWO already has the word.

      I think this .*? is searching for any character including the closing brace }.

        > s .*? is searching for any character including the closing brace }.

        Yes, that's why I added an alternative.

        Cheers Rolf
        (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
        Wikisyntax for the Monastery