http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=931096


in reply to a use for Win32::LoadLibrary()

I, for one, have never understood why Windows still has such a primitive way of supporting libraries ... no versioning.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: a use for Win32::LoadLibrary()
by wazoox (Prior) on Oct 17, 2011 at 10:46 UTC
    I'm a strict Unixian, but apparently Windows supports some form of library versioning since Windows XP. According to this page, true DLL numbering even became standard in Visual Studio 2010 (better late than never).
[reply]
Re^2: a use for Win32::LoadLibrary()
by afoken (Chancellor) on Oct 15, 2011 at 20:16 UTC

    Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly. -- Henry Spencer

    Alexander

    --
    Today I will gladly share my knowledge and experience, for there are no sweeter words than "I told you so". ;-)
[reply]

      Are .so files versioned?

      With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
      Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
      "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
      In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
[reply]

In Section Meditations