Re: Moose::Meta::Class needs a package?

What I'm really curious about, is the need for the Empty package. If I substitute the Empty for Moose directly I get the error:

You want Moose::Object, not Moose.

-stvn

Comment on Re: Moose::Meta::Class needs a package?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Moose::Meta::Class needs a package? by Boldra (Deacon) on Jul 12, 2011 at 08:38 UTC
Thankyou! That is much cleaner now. - Boldra	[reply]