Re^2: Efficient way to fork processes and keep a running count?

in reply to Re: Efficient way to fork processes and keep a running count?
in thread Efficient way to fork processes and keep a running count?

You are violently agreeing with the OP. He said the fourth child should be forked after one of the original three had exited, meaning at most three children exist at any given time.

Comment on Re^2: Efficient way to fork processes and keep a running count?

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom