in reply to Re: Licensing for Safety
in thread Licensing for Safety

It just occurred to me that the GPL probably isn't an option in my particular scenario because of its lack of compatibility (to my understanding, but I may be wrong) with Python's license. Darn...

Update: Actually, after having read this, Python code seems to be GPL-able in 2.1...but the web host uses v1.5.2...doh, I lose again. :)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Licensing for Safety
by orkysoft (Friar) on Apr 25, 2001 at 02:27 UTC
    Why would the license of your code be restricted by the license of the interpreter/compiler? Can't you GPL your code, even though the interpreter isn't GPL?