in reply to Re (tilly) 3: out of loop
in thread out of loop
This was an illustrative snippet, to show how die could used to exit a loop. As such, I simplified a number of things, like no shebang, no use strict, not all the variables are initialized, and yes, limited error handling.
Had this been a real program, it would have used my home grown alarm object, which checks $!, $?, and $@, builds a meaningful error string, logs it to a file with a timestamp, sends email, and dies as necessary. This same object I proselytize within my company, much the same way you are doing now.
Had I included all that extraneous detail in my post, I fear the point would have been lost. And given it was essentially a "by the way" post, it would have required more effort than warranted to make it as explicit as you might like.
So while I understand the reasons for your strongly stated response, I believe it misplaced.
Had this been a real program, it would have used my home grown alarm object, which checks $!, $?, and $@, builds a meaningful error string, logs it to a file with a timestamp, sends email, and dies as necessary. This same object I proselytize within my company, much the same way you are doing now.
Had I included all that extraneous detail in my post, I fear the point would have been lost. And given it was essentially a "by the way" post, it would have required more effort than warranted to make it as explicit as you might like.
So while I understand the reasons for your strongly stated response, I believe it misplaced.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re (tilly) 5: out of loop
by tilly (Archbishop) on Mar 31, 2001 at 22:58 UTC | |
by indigo (Scribe) on Mar 31, 2001 at 23:30 UTC | |
by tilly (Archbishop) on Mar 31, 2001 at 23:45 UTC | |
by indigo (Scribe) on Apr 01, 2001 at 02:35 UTC | |
by tilly (Archbishop) on Apr 01, 2001 at 04:15 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom