http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=576798


in reply to Re^2: How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?
in thread How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?

I'm sure there are enough interested janitors to keep an eye on the nodes and unapprove them if need be.

Adding a janitorial edit note to the node indicating why it shouldn't be approved should generally be sufficient, although the OP can re-edit to remove such a note. The node can be reaped if need be, but that doesn't give the perp a chance to redeem himself - we should at least allow that chance.


DWIM is Perl's answer to Gödel
  • Comment on Re^3: How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?