http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=562784


in reply to Benchmarking MP3::Tag vs. MP3::Info

It would be nice to also post the results of your benchmarking, for those who don't have the modules/don't want to have the modules installed ...

--
b10m

All code is usually tested, but rarely trusted.
  • Comment on Re: Benchmarking MP3::Tag vs. MP3::Info

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Benchmarking MP3::Tag vs. MP3::Info
by dha (Acolyte) on Jul 21, 2006 at 16:59 UTC
    My apologies. I guess my underlying assumption was that if you didn't have them installed, you wouldn't actually care. :-)
    ~/mp3tools 12:46:27% perl tagbench.pl Perlcast_Interview_001_brian_foy +.mp3 Benchmark: timing 10000 iterations of autotag, info, manualtag... autotag: 269 wallclock secs (66.60 usr 70.78 sys + 8.18 cusr 56.58 + csys = 202.14 CPU) @ 72.79/s (n=10000) info: 12 wallclock secs ( 8.44 usr + 1.06 sys = 9.50 CPU) @ 10 +52.63/s (n=10000) manualtag: 202 wallclock secs (25.07 usr 65.54 sys + 8.18 cusr 56.49 + csys = 155.28 CPU) @ 110.36/s (n=10000)