http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=519819


in reply to Re^2: "eval"ing a hash without eval
in thread "eval"ing a hash without eval

I had somehow missed the reply to BrowserUk when I posted. I did write I have a feeling I'm missing the complexity here. And it did occur to me that Ovid was unlikely to have overlooked any simple solutions.

After seeing the reply to BrowserUk I considered updating my original. But I could think of nothing actually useful to add. So instead everybody gets your entirely accurate but somewhat snotty reply, and my waste-of-space defensive rebuttal. Luckily we are all professional enough not to take offense ;)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: "eval"ing a hash without eval
by Ovid (Cardinal) on Dec 29, 2005 at 19:31 UTC

    And it did occur to me that Ovid was unlikely to have overlooked any simple solutions.

    I have, on numerous occassions, missed blindingly obvious solutions, so I rarely mind them being pointed out to me.

    Cheers,
    Ovid

    New address of my CGI Course.