(OT)C++Monks?

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Comment on (OT)C++Monks?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: (OT)C++Monks? by hossman (Prior) on Jun 15, 2002 at 01:40 UTC
see Perl monkish sites see Perl monkish sites CIToldYouItCouldWork sounds good to me. The most useful advice I can give you based on my understanding of your question is this link (PS: can someone please edit the orriginal node and close the list)	[reply]
Re: (OT)C++Monks? by hossman (Prior) on Jun 17, 2002 at 19:13 UTC
It just occured to me that you ment "Everything" as in the "Everything Development Engine" that powers perlmonks, not "everything" as in some really bizare question that made no sense to me. Let me revise my answer to #4 and say: "I have no idea, but you might want to try the link at the bottom of every perlmonk page that says The Everything Development Company"	[reply]
Re: (OT)C++Monks? by kechari (Novice) on Jun 24, 2002 at 02:36 UTC
> 3. ...what should such an assemblage be called? ... monc++ C monks++ C++monks (hey, why not just be totally parallel, we've got a good thing going) c++ monkeys (like Sea Monkeys) The Holy C++ (like Holy See) C++ Acolytes The Sc++ientists C++farers C++onference The Gnostic++s MouseC++teers `-- -ken rich "I'm continually AMAZED at th'breathtaking effects of WIND EROSION!!" (Zippy)` [download]	[reply] [d/l]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.