in reply to Re^4: OO systems and Perl 5 (Was: Recap: Future of Perl 5)
in thread OO systems and Perl 5 (Was: Recap: Future of Perl 5)
Semantics count and the will to blend it into Perl 4.
NB: Python has no packages.
I already explained my interpretation of compromises he did for more flexibility.
edit
BUT I have to admit that I struggled a lot with Perlootut before reading Damian's book....
There is a saying that emacs is not an IDE but an IDE construction set.
The same seems to apply to Perl and OOP.
You can mimic most of the syntactic sugar of Python, though I'd rather try copying Ruby.
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^6: OO systems and Perl 5 (updated)
by RonW (Parson) on Aug 31, 2018 at 21:08 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 31, 2018 at 21:34 UTC |