in reply to Re^10: And here's why I think "downvotes" should be eliminated, or tabulated separately ... (node order)
in thread And here's why I think "downvotes" should be eliminated, or tabulated separately ...
I can remember quite a few occasions where the highest rep answer wasn't the most useful one for the problem I searched for
And you remember few occasions where the most quickly posted answer wasn't the most useful one for the problem you searched for? Otherwise, you present the weakest of arguments against the proposal.
So, add to that "I don't want to use that configuration", which is not an argument against it since registered users have had the option to choose from several configurations for a decade already. Also, one downvote lacking any accompanying explanation.
I think the arguments "for" are winning rather decisively, despite their quite modest showing.
- tye
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^12: And here's why I think "downvotes" should be eliminated, or tabulated separately ... (node order)
by Anonymous Monk on Jul 07, 2015 at 07:47 UTC | |
Re^12: And here's why I think "downvotes" should be eliminated, or tabulated separately ... (node order)
by Arunbear (Prior) on Jul 08, 2015 at 13:10 UTC | |
by tye (Sage) on Jul 08, 2015 at 14:18 UTC | |
by jdporter (Paladin) on Jul 08, 2015 at 17:17 UTC | |
by Arunbear (Prior) on Jul 08, 2015 at 17:26 UTC |