http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=1040251


in reply to Re^2: (Toward a better PerlMonks) Who do we serve, and why, and how can we do it better?
in thread (Toward a better PerlMonks) Who do we serve, and why, and how can we do it better?

I sometimes sorely wish that folks could disavow themselves of the notion that “I take XP personally,” because I don’t. (Gasp!)
You protest too much, methinks, insisting, again and again and again, that you don't care about XP and being downvoted, to the point that folks naturally suspect the opposite. For example:

If you are truly indifferent to downvotes, why repeatedly put forward the suggestion of removing them from this site?

Update: Added extra quotes from Re^3: Threads and signals in Windows (invoking the name), Re: Lots of votes with nowhere to go :-), Re^3: Fork Results in thousands of processes, and Re^3: How to deal with the fact that Perl is not releasing memory and others.

Update: See also Re^2: Huffington Post: "Let's Do Away With Anonymous Posting" and Re^4: Huffington Post: "Let's Do Away With Anonymous Posting".

  • Comment on Re^3: (Toward a better PerlMonks) Who do we serve, and why, and how can we do it better?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: (Toward a better PerlMonks) Who do we serve, and why, and how can we do it better?
by Argel (Prior) on Jun 25, 2013 at 21:08 UTC
    Right, he cares so much about XP that he posts these types of nodes that he knows will generate lots of downvotes that presumably translate into losing XP. And he is a bit more on the prolific side, so I'm not sure how much I would read into the quantity of posts. Well, I will concede that perhaps he is interested in losing XP....

    Elda Taluta; Sarks Sark; Ark Arks
    My deviantART gallery