in reply to Re^7: typeglob/symbolic reference question
in thread typeglob/symbolic reference question
Why do you need to put so many complications around it?
Sorry. I just wanted to find an explanation for the syntax. I understand what the net result is--but if I don't understand how perl interprets the syntax then I won't be able to figure out what is happening in other contexts.
I guess for now I'll just have to go with *color and *{"color"} are equivalent--even though *{"color"} is not legal under strict refs.
Thanks.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^9: typeglob/symbolic reference question
by andal (Hermit) on Nov 09, 2010 at 09:37 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom