Re^3: Status of Recent User Information Leak

in reply to Re^2: Status of Recent User Information Leak
in thread Status of Recent User Information Leak

It's just the way the original node is worded -- apparently the gods were notified twice, two months apart. I was hoping that Co-Rion just mis-wrote the text and the gods were only notified once, on July 28th.

Added: Note that I'm not looking for a link, and I agree that the fewer links to it, the better (no reason to make them all happy by giving them extra attention, not an attempt at "security through obscurity").

Comment on Re^3: Status of Recent User Information Leak

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Status of Recent User Information Leak by Argel (Prior) on Jul 31, 2009 at 22:13 UTC
The real problem is it's written as if the intent was to include the link to the ezine. Replace the link to the Wikipedia article with a link to the ezine and the sentence makes perfect sense. Well, you would need to follow the link, but after that it would make sense. Elda Taluta; Sarks Sark; Ark Arks	[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion