http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=620346


in reply to Re^5: Running SuperSearch off a fast full-text index.
in thread Running SuperSearch off a fast full-text index.

I added you as an owner.
  • Comment on Re^6: Running SuperSearch off a fast full-text index.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Running SuperSearch off a fast full-text index.
by creamygoodness (Curate) on Jun 10, 2007 at 20:04 UTC

    Groovy. I've successfully checked out from the svn repository via https. I'll wait for you to set up trunk like a module distro. If you haven't got a name you prefer for the base module namespace over "MonkSearch", that would be my suggestion. BTW, I just had a glance at the code in your CPAN distros, and your stuff look great.

    My impulse is to conduct our discussions here on PerlMonks... what do you think?

    --
    Marvin Humphrey
    Rectangular Research ― http://www.rectangular.com
      I've successfully checked out from the svn repository via https. I'll wait for you to set up trunk like a module distro. If you haven't got a name you prefer for the base module namespace over "MonkSearch", that would be my suggestion.
        MonkSearch works for me. Should it be App::MonkSearch maybe? Also, we may end up with more than just the indexers -- there will also be the web interface(s).
      I just had a glance at the code in your CPAN distros, and your stuff look great.
        Except SQL::Tidy! Thanks ;)
      My impulse is to conduct our discussions here on PerlMonks... what do you think?
        In this thread?
        App::MonkSearch

        Sure, that'll work... Randy Kobes' CPAN search modules are under CPAN::Search::Lite, FWIW.

        In this thread?

        Probably not all in this thread. We might start a new thread called "MonkSearch - spider" to deal with spidering issues, for example.

        I think it's important to facilitate participation by anyone in the PerlMonks community who wants to join in. The downside is that we might end up creating more messages than the PerlMonks threading model is optimized for, but this isn't that big a project and I think the volume will be manageable.

        --
        Marvin Humphrey
        Rectangular Research ― http://www.rectangular.com
        I would also prefer discussion and than summary on wiki.

        OOH, storing nodes locally in SQLite seems like an overkill. With good filesystem there is no reason to complicate crawler with DBI code, just dump files on disk.


        2share!2flame...
      My impulse is to conduct our discussions here on PerlMonks... what do you think?
        I was poking around some other projects hosted on code.google.com, and another way to go is to create a google group for it -- they integrate nicely and seem to be an accepted way to communicate for a lot of code.google.com projects. You also get an email address.
        Right, that's the other option. I'd prefer to have the discussions here. educated_foo has already made a worthwhile contribution. If we go off on our own isolated corner of the 'net, we won't get the benefit of having our ideas challenged by this rich community.
        --
        Marvin Humphrey
        Rectangular Research ― http://www.rectangular.com